-18dB signal in is more than enough headroom. You have 18dB to work with before you hit 0dB (after that, it clips of course).
That's a huge amount of headroom.
-18dB signal in is more than enough headroom. You have 18dB to work with before you hit 0dB (after that, it clips of course).
I appreciate all the advice. Going through a learning curve with this stuff right now.lll wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:51 pm I only use busses ("sends") if:
- I've got multiple guitar tracks that need the same effect ("tweak once - affect many tracks" concept... and cuts down on processor load too)
for example, I have two tracks, doubled rhythm part. I want to put Eventide on them both, or maybe an 1176
- I want to blend an effect (Eventide, delay, reverb etc) with the dry tone using the channel fader
- I want to not only blend an effect, but pan it too (Van Halen 1st album)
- I want to keep the dry guitar tone separate from an effect (Van Halen 1st album reverb) so the dry tone doesn't get lost in reverb wash
- In a big project with countless tracks, I want to "conglomeratize" (haha fake word) many tracks (usually similar instruments) to one channel so I can quickly grab the channel fader
Not a prob.PLX wrote: ↑Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:20 pm I appreciate all the advice. Going through a learning curve with this stuff right now.![]()
I watched some tutorials on LUFS and Reaper DAW this afternoon, and I downloaded the free plug-in the tutorial was demonstrating (YOULEAN Loudness Meter 2) and I managed to figure out how to access the master buss VU meter config and change it to "RMS ONLY".
I'm going to re-record with this new knowledge and see how much this improves my tone in recorded clips.
HEEE (He-Man!) MANNN (Woman Haaaaaterrr!)PLX wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 3:44 am So, just applying the things you talked about here in this thread, I can hear an immense improvement in getting the recorded tone to more closely resemble what the amp/cab actually sound like in the room![]()
JCM-800
variac @ 70VAC
2 6CA7's (two tubes pulled)
bass, middle, treble on 10
preamp on 6
8Ω tap into 16Ω 4x12 cabinet
SM-57 off axis, on cone 1" away
LUFS set at -14
still got a lot to learn![]()
Damn dude, you got good earslll wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 4:56 am I'd say the top end is good. Bright and crunchy without being harsh.
But it needs more balls in the low end (keep in mind, this is not a tone that is featured in a mix, but rather, by itself - if it was in a mix, this current EQing might be all that's needed). Try fiddling with upping around 100-150Hz some, but with a somewhat "skinny" Q (bandwidth) so there's not too much flub. Needs that cab thump, and 125Hz is the generally accept "thump" frequency.
Post it up let's hear itPLX wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:05 amDamn dude, you got good earslll wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 4:56 am I'd say the top end is good. Bright and crunchy without being harsh.
But it needs more balls in the low end (keep in mind, this is not a tone that is featured in a mix, but rather, by itself - if it was in a mix, this current EQing might be all that's needed). Try fiddling with upping around 100-150Hz some, but with a somewhat "skinny" Q (bandwidth) so there's not too much flub. Needs that cab thump, and 125Hz is the generally accept "thump" frequency.![]()
Bumped 150Hz by 7dB and rendered. Listened to the two tracks back-to-back..
That was exactly what that clip needed.![]()
I thought about that, but I'm already using the Pultec MEQ-5 on that track, and using it to DIP 700Hz.
Can you dip it more? Try that.
Dipped 700Hz more.lll wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:28 am Can you dip it more? Try that.
You might want to SM57 straight-on (instead of off-axis) to slightly remove those "honk" mids and also get a skoosh more proximity effect (low end thump).
Generally, mics placed off-axis pull in more midrange... and sometimes not the good midrange (honk honk).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests